The highest value of the plot is a wonderful view stretching out. The idea was for the house to become its framework that crops it. The most appropriate building turned out to be a fully open on mountain landscape one-storey building, which gives the same view to all of the interiors.
Because of the plot being located in an absolute wilderness a problem of security came out. The solution turned out to be “twisting” the building so as only its one corner touches the ground and the rest is hang over the edge of the hill. With this solution, part of the ground floor where the bedrooms were located was pulled up to the level of the first floor.
Location of the house on a steep slope, was followed by high risk of landslip, more and more frequent in polish mountains. As to limit the movement of the subsoil the house was treated as a bridge, under which rain water flows naturally.
The highest value of the plot is a wonderful view stretching out. The idea was for the house to become its framework that crops it. The most appropriate building turned out to be a fully open on mountain landscape one-storey building, which gives the same view to all of the interiors.
Because of the plot being located in an absolute wilderness a problem of security came out. The solution turned out to be “twisting” the building so as only its one corner touches the ground and the rest is hang over the edge of the hill. With this solution, part of the ground floor where the bedrooms were located was pulled up to the level of the first floor.
Location of the house on a steep slope, was followed by high risk of landslip, more and more frequent in polish mountains. As to limit the movement of the subsoil the house was treated as a bridge, under which rain water flows naturally.
The highest value of the plot is a wonderful view stretching out. The idea was for the house to become its framework that crops it. The most appropriate building turned out to be a fully open on mountain landscape one-storey building, which gives the same view to all of the interiors.
Because of the plot being located in an absolute wilderness a problem of security came out. The solution turned out to be “twisting” the building so as only its one corner touches the ground and the rest is hang over the edge of the hill. With this solution, part of the ground floor where the bedrooms were located was pulled up to the level of the first floor.
Location of the house on a steep slope, was followed by high risk of landslip, more and more frequent in polish mountains. As to limit the movement of the subsoil the house was treated as a bridge, under which rain water flows naturally.
Realities of mountain landscape as well as the local law constrained a gable roof. House took the form of a typical barn standing on three thin walls.
To give rigidity to the building the walls were tensed by the planes of the ”inverted” roof, slightly lifted over gound. Their incline increased the feeling of security. The building began to resamble an arc floating over the fields.
Realities of mountain landscape as well as the local law constrained a gable roof. House took the form of a typical barn standing on three thin walls.
To give rigidity to the building the walls were tensed by the planes of the ”inverted” roof, slightly lifted over gound. Their incline increased the feeling of security. The building began to resamble an arc floating over the fields.
The abandonment of the fence around the plot and putting it in the form of movable elements to the outline of the building resulted in its general accessibility, but also a kind of symbiosis between the residents of the house and animals grazing around, while looking for food, simultaneously mowing the grass around the building. The use of moving elements has made the fence temporary. Its functionality has also increased, because it is also the entrance to the house and a sun screen, ideally composing with the building’s form.
The abandonment of the fence around the plot and putting it in the form of movable elements to the outline of the building resulted in its general accessibility, but also a kind of symbiosis between the residents of the house and animals grazing around, while looking for food, simultaneously mowing the grass around the building. The use of moving elements has made the fence temporary. Its functionality has also increased, because it is also the entrance to the house and a sun screen, ideally composing with the building’s form.
Animals, living on the pasture around our house, started to treat the Ark, aspecially the space below the concrete body as their home – they can find a shelter there during rain and strong wind or they can simply rub themselves up the egdes of Ark. We would never thought, that when at the beginning, the name, Konieczny’s Ark came from the form of the building, life will add the second meaning to it.
name: | konieczny’s ark |
author: | robert konieczny |
authorial collaboration: | łukasz marciniak |
collaboration: | marcin harnasz |
aneta świeżak | |
construction: | kornel szyndler |
investor: | robert konieczny |
site area: | 1694 m2 |
useable floor area: | 138 m2 |
volume: | 624 m3 |
project: | 2011 |
realization: | 2010-2015 |
photographs: | jakub certowicz |
olo studio |
awards: | wallpaper design award – best new private house 2017 |
grand prix in the plebiscite of polish architecture xxl 2016 | |
I prize in residential buildings category in the |
plebiscite of polish architecture xxl 2016 | |
nomination for mies van der rohe award 2017 | |
the finalist of the world architecture festival 2016 in the house category | |
I prize in the polski cement w architekturze competition 2016 | |
I prize in the architecture of a year 2014 competition in silesian region 2015 | |
honourable mention in the ‘prize of the year’ competition in the category of single-family house 2015 | |
the winner of polityka architecture award 2016 | |
publications: | iw magazine 04 2017 |
dolce vita 09 2016 | |
dobre wnętrze 07 2016 | |
häuser 07 2016 | |
octogon 06 2016 | |
architektura&biznes 05 2016 |
interni 04 2016 |
id+c 04 2016 |
A10 04 2016 |
icon 03 2016 |
mark magazine 02/03 2016 |
diseño interior 02 2016 |
architektura murator 12 2015
exhibitions: | vita contemplativa – hesse/konieczny/stinessen architektur galerie berlin, germany 07/08 2018 |
venice biennale 2018 – blurred boundaries, palazzo bembo, italy 05/11 2018 | |
robert konieczny – tailored-made spaces, brno 05 2017 | |
architects at the piano, katowice 12 2016 | |
single-family house in the visegrad group countries, hungary 2016 | |